Monday, April 23, 2007

2 POINT RAMBLING

1st point

I'm completely enamored by anything British. I am, as my friend Allan said before, an anglophile. I have no idea why that is. It just is.

Last night, as I lay on the couch for the whole day (I was bed, rather, couch-ridden), I could not do anything but watch shows and movies on the telly. (Can people tell how hard I'm trying to be or sound Brit?) And thank God for BBC America! Okay, I have to say that I was a bit disappointed with BBC America. I thought I would be able to see a lot more soaps or britcoms on it. But no! It's all about Footballers' Wives (I don't like that show anymore) or In the City or Robin Hood. And I don't particularly like those shows. But anyway, last night, they showed a docudrama entitled "After Thomas." While I could have watched other films, I decided to watch that one for 2 reasons:

1) Ben Miles played one of the lead stars. I doubt his name would ring a bell. He's not that famous (at least as far as I can tell), not even in the UK. But I like him. I liked him ever since I started watching Coupling (Malou, did you finish watching that, after all?) And I tried watching most of the movies (that's on DVD) that he's been in. And sadly, he's mostly done telly. *sniff sniff*

Oh! Btw, just in case you're wondering, he's not that good looking. I liked how he played his character in Coupling. And I like the way he can just transform his voice. He usually does radio plays, adverts, voice-overs, and audio books because he has such a great speaking voice (when he modulates it, that is).

2) It's about a 6-year-old boy who suffered from autism. I did not know much about autism and was not interested in the disease until I learned of a friend whose 6-year-old son (yeah, eerie I know!) suffers from mild autism.

I took an interest in the film and watched it. And I loved it to bits. It is now my most favorite film of all time, although it's only a made-for-TV movie. It's such a moving and touching film. You guys have to see it. Check BBC America for show times. I highly recommend it.

It showed the toll it took on the family as they battle Kyle's autism; how heart-wrenching it is for the mom and the dad to be faced with the fact that their son could possibly never love them; how wonderful and loving Kyle's family is to never have given up on him and not had him sent to a boarding school for kids with autism; and how a dog, a golden retreiver, changed Kyle for the better.

Again, it's an amazing movie. If you want a touchy-feely, comedic (at times), moving movie, this is definitely worth your 2 hours (with commercials).

Did I mention it's a TRUE STORY?

2nd point

One experiment I hated doing (aside from the 12 hour ones I described in detail in my previous post, "Grateful for this 12 hour experiment) is Microscopy. One would have to go into what we call here in the lab as the "batcave," a small, dark room filled with 4 different kinds of microscopes hooked up to a camera and computer, and spend several hours cramped up in that tiny room looking at "microscopic" cells.

I had to do that this morning. Normally, whenever I had to spend 3 hours counting weird cells in the batcave, I'm alone. But this time, when I got there, someone was already using the microscope next to the one I was about to use. It was the newest addition to our lab. The half-french, half-greek postdoctoral fellow. I never had the chance to talk to him, 'coz he always works with one particular person. And they're always busy. So, as he was looking for cells that were successfully transfected and I was looking for cells that were suspended in the mitotic stage, he and I chatted away. Interestingly enough, we talked about "The Crystal Maze" (who remembers that show? Anyone?), and "Mr. Bean."

He then made the observation that we watched the same things growing up. So, he made the conclusion that we're about the same age. He asked when I was born. I told him the year. And he was born a year before me. I said that he's a year older. He said, "Maybe not. I think it's less than a year. I was born in November." I told him, "Nope! You're still a year and a month older than me."

Anyway, microscope work didn't seem as tedious and boring, when there's another person to chat with. =)

Thursday, April 19, 2007

RANDOM THOUGHTS

*
I watched Into Great Silence (not shown everywhere) on Saturday. It was a 2 hour and 45 minute film documenting the lives of Carthusian Monks on the French Alps. It was filmed by a one-man crew. No artificial lighting was used. There were no interviews, well, except one. There were no explanations for what the monks were doing at a particular point in time. It was an interesting film.

One unforgettable scene that's etched in my mind forever is the very brief interview with the blind monk (Sorry, his name was never mentioned. I wouldn't call him, "the blind monk" had I known his name). He said, "God is INFINITELY GOOD. Everything He does is for the good of our souls." That's my mantra nowadays.

**
I am giving myself a month and a week to rise from the ashes. I claim the birth of a new me on Pentecost Sunday, May 27, 2007, just as the birth of the new church happened on Pentecost more than 2000 years ago.




Wednesday, April 18, 2007

WRITING TO THE NY TIMES

At lunch today, I read the NY Times that was in our library. The front page was already taken so I had to settle for the Dining section of the NY Times. I was reading the article about the human sushi tray. Okay, to clarify. It's not sushi made from raw human flesh, but rather, a restaurant serves its sushi on human trays. Apparently, the lady that would serve as a tray, would have banana leaves plastered to her body. And the sushi would be placed on top of the banana leaves. Anyway, I don't even know why I read that. I guess I was really bored.

Then, I glanced at the top of the page and saw the word "Kalderetang." And I thought, "No Way!" So I had to read the tiny article to make sure it's talking about the "Kaldereta" that I'm familiar with. And yup! It was! It featured a restaurant called Pistahan in New York. Don't believe me? See for yourselves

Though I was really happy that it was featured on New York Times, I was disappointed. Why? Because the title said, "A serving of Kalderetang, and a guy to explain it." I mean, "Kalderetang" what? Kalderetang a guy? What the heck is that? That's like saying "a serving of poached, and a guy to explain it." Poached what?

Anywho, I wrote to the NY Times, explaining that adding the "ng" to the end of Kaldereta made it an adjective and therefore needed a noun after it.

I'm not sure if it will ever be published at the "Letters" section. It's probably too small an article to even be noticed. But come on! Even if it did appear on the Dining section and not the front page, shouldn't they be making sure that they got all their information right. That's what's journalism is about, right? Or am I making a big fuzz out of it. Anyway, I, at least was able to tell them what's what. I'll let you know if they put my letter up.

Friday, April 13, 2007

GRATEFUL FOR THIS 12-HOUR EXPERIMENT

Sigh! I've been doing 12-hour experiments for the past couple of weeks, 3 to be exact. Sigh!

Just an overview of the experiment, which goes for 3 days:

1st day - split cells such that they're 30% confluent after 5 hours (9 am)
5 hours later (2 pm) - block cell division using 2 mM thymidine. Leave thymidine on cells for 19 hours

2nd day - ( 9 am) wash thymidine off. Put new media to help cells grow. Leave media on cells for 9 hours
9 hours later (6 pm) - block cell division using 2 mM thymidine. Leave thymidine on cells for 16 hours

3rd day - (10 am) wash thymidine off. Feed cells with media to induce them to divide.
Collect cells after 8 hours (6 pm), 9 hours (7 pm), 10 hours (8 pm), 11 hours (9 pm), 12 hours (10 pm).

O di ba? Kainis!

Anyway, I'm not suppose to do these kinds of experiments. It's against my contract. But, because of politics at work, and because I'm quitting this job in July, my boss is making sure that she makes good use of me before I leave. I'm usually upset and agitated whenever I'm on the 3rd day of the experiment because I hate staying in the lab for 12 hours.

But not today.

Don't get me wrong. I'm still upset that I have to be here for 12 hours. but something happened today. An angel was sent to me today. O:-)

She's a sister I haven't personally met yet. We were introduced through friendster and YM, but being that she's in the Philippines, I never had the chance to meet her face-to-face yet. But despite the fact that we never met in person, she's been a constant companion and an angel sent by God to me.

It's uncanny how God makes sure that she's online whenever I need to hear God's many messages that I've been blocking off for quite some time now. And today was no exception. I haven't seen her online for about 2 months now. And since I have time to burn (I still have about an hour left before I completely finish the 12-hour experiment), she and I had been chatting. And gosh, she knows and understands what I'm going through. She's able to sympathize with me and at the same time prod me to take baby steps to full recovery. She listens (or reads what I had typed) to everything I have to say and gives me great insights and advices. She's truly an angel. =)

Mitz, you're truly heaven sent, not only to K. Junby, but also to me. Thank you so much for everything. *hugs*